California Anti-Spyware Bills Move Forward

SACRAMENTO – A pair of anti-spyware bills in California’s legislature moved forward on Tuesday.

Senate Bill 1436, introduced by Sen. Kevin Murray, D-Los Angeles, was approved by the Senate's Judiciary Committee. The piece of legislation would provide for a $1,000 fine for installing spyware on a computer in the state without giving the recipient notice. The bill will next be considered by the full Senate.

Assembly Bill 2787, introduced by Assemblyman Tim Leslie, R-Roseville, gained approval from the Assembly's Judiciary Committee. The bill would prohibit hijacking, surreptitious surveillance and inhibiting termination of a program. It will face the full Assembly before the end of May.

The issue of spyware, which is software that is employed unbeknownst to users, has been a hot topic for both consumers and legislators in the past few years.

Internet service provider EarthLink and Webroot Software commissioned a study recently that found the average computer houses roughly 28 items of monitoring software.

Other lawmakers also are turning to legislation to limit or eliminate spyware.

U.S. Sens. Barbara Boxer, D-Calif., and Conrad Burns, R.-Mont., recently introduced legislation to prohibit spyware, adware and other intrusive software. The proposed act, known as Spyblock, would make it illegal to install software on a user's computer without notice and consent.

The Federal Trade Commission last month held a hearing in Washington, D.C., to examine the matter. Titled "Monitoring Software on Your PC: Spyware, Adware, and Other Software," the hearing provided dialogue on the subject and looked for possible solutions.

Utah's recently passed anti-spyware law is currently being challenged by Salt Lake City-based WhenU, which claims the statute is unconstitutional and limits the online advertising company's right to commercial speech.

Copyright © 2025 Adnet Media. All Rights Reserved. XBIZ is a trademark of Adnet Media.
Reproduction in whole or in part in any form or medium without express written permission is prohibited.

More News

NYC Adult Businesses Seek SCOTUS Appeal in Zoning Case

Attorneys representing a group of New York City adult businesses are asking the U.S. Supreme Court to hear an appeal of a lower court’s decision allowing enforcement of a 2001 zoning law aimed at forcing adult retail stores out of most parts of New York City.

Teasy Agency Launches Marketing Firm

Teasy Agency has officially launched Teasy Marketing firm.

Ofcom Investigates More Sites in Wake of AV Traffic Shifts

U.K. media regulator Ofcom has launched investigations into 20 more adult sites as part of its age assurance enforcement program under the Online Safety Act.

MintStars Launches Debit Card for Creators

MintStars has launched its MintStars Creator Card, powered by Payy.

xHamster Settles Texas AV Lawsuit, Pays $120,000

Hammy Media, parent company of xHamster, has settled a lawsuit brought by the state of Texas over alleged noncompliance with the state’s age verification law, agreeing to pay a $120,000 penalty.

RevealMe Joins Pineapple Support as Partner-Level Sponsor

RevealMe has joined the ranks of over 70 adult businesses and organizations committing funds and resources to Pineapple Support.

OnlyFans Institutes Criminal Background Checks for US Creators

OnlyFans will screen creators in the United States for criminal convictions, CEO Keily Blair has announced in a post on LinkedIn.

Pineapple Support to Host 'Healthier Relationships' Support Group

Pineapple Support is hosting a free online support group on enhancing connection and personal growth.

Strike 3 Rejects Meta 'Personal Use' Defense in AI Suit

Vixen Media Group owner Strike 3 Holdings this week responded to Facebook parent company Meta’s motion to dismiss Strike 3’s suit accusing Meta of pirating VMG content to train its artificial intelligence models.

Pornhub, Stripchat: VLOP Designation Based on Flawed Data

In separate cases, attorneys for Pornhub and Stripchat this week told the EU’s General Court that the European Commission relied on unreliable data when it classified the sites as “very large online platforms” (VLOPs) under the EU’s Digital Services Act, news organization MLex reports.

Show More